Del Bigtree – Part 1 | History, Politics, & Human Rights

Video Transcript – Be Brave! – Is Vaccine Science Really Settled? (Part 1)

So let’s start here. Here are the slogans that we always hear. “Vaccines are safe and effective.” “Vaccine injury is rare.” And my favorite, “the science is settled.” The least scientific statement is known to man. Anyone that says this should lose any license that they currently have as far as I’m concerned. So let’s deal with that. When I think about the science is settled, I think that they have set the bar so low. You’re essentially saying that this science is the most immaculate science on the planet because we’re the only ones arrogant enough, we’re the only scientific body arrogant enough to even make this claim. No one else in science would ever even dare to say the science is settled and cannot be questioned. So if you’ve reached this level that you are so perfect, then I should only have to add a little bit of doubt.

If there’s even the potential for reasonable doubt, let’s look at it like that. Let’s look at it like a court case. Can I put reasonable doubt into your mind that maybe this is not true? I have. Let’s do it again. Here’s how it started last time. Bobby Kennedy was asked to go to the National Institute of Health by Donald Trump to talk to all the luminaries of our immunology and infectious disease departments. We put together this PowerPoint that always starts like this. I was sitting there. Bobby was brilliant. There were about eight of us on our side of the table and 12 of them including Tony Fauci, Head of Infectious Disease, Francis Collins, Head of The National Institute of Health. And this is how we started it.

In 2017, Dr. Peter Aaby who was involved in designing the vaccine programs for the third world decided to do the study we’ve all been asking for. How about you compare vaccinated children to totally unvaccinated children. Don’t keep telling us it makes us healthier, prove it. Prove it. Use the scientific method. Go ahead. We’re all open for it. So he did. He looked at a DTP vaccine program that took place 30 years ago in Guinea Africa, and what he recognized was the way we laid out the program, we were so specific about the ages of the children, and the difficulties it was to get to every village that by the end of that year, we had only vaccinated almost exactly half of the children. And the other half we had not. Totally randomized study, perfect. I can compare both groups, and this is what he discovered. DTP was associated with a fivefold higher mortality than being unvaccinated.

V is for Vaccine NATIONWIDE TOUR ANNOUNCEMENT

The educational group V is for Vaccine takes their demonstrations on tour across the country. This is the special announcement. Editing by co-founder Joshua Coleman.

V For Vaccine: The San Diego Takeover

The vaccine educator demonstrators take over Comic Con 2019. Camera and editing by Joshua Coleman.

Joshua Coleman’s V IS FOR VACCINE speech at the Capitol

Joshua Coleman gives a speech introducing the innovative new way of educating the public on vaccine education entitled “V is for vaccine”. This new campaign uses large signs with easy to digest basic facts about vaccination that can’t be ignored when seen in public. Camera by Martin Vo and Phil Mor with editing by Joshua Coleman.

Vaccine revolution in one State of the union
(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealedclick here.)
Well, what do you know?  One state in the US is pushing back against mandatory vaccination of children.  And not just pushing back—but, standing on Constitutional principle.  In the state legislature.

It’s South Dakota.

A few days ago, House Bill 1235 was introduced.

As inforum.com reports: “South Dakota bill introduced to prohibit schools from requiring immunizations,” (Feb 5, 2020):

“House Bill 1235 states that ‘No public or nonpublic post secondary educational institutions may mandate any immunizations for school entry. A public or private post secondary educational institution may request any student to submit medical records. No educational institution may use coercive means to require immunization’.”

“The bill would make it a Class 1 misdemeanor for ‘any educational institution, medical provider, or person to compel another to submit to immunization,’ according to the bill text.”

And then, here is the principle, boldly put in the bill:

“‘Every person has the inalienable right to bodily integrity, free from any threat or compulsion that the person accepts any medical intervention, including immunization. No person may be discriminated against for refusal to accept an unwanted medical intervention, including immunization,’ the bill states.”

An idea whose time has come.  An idea whose time is centuries old.

As most readers know, the CDC, state health agencies, vaccine manufacturers, tech giant censors, and various other medical/government honchos have been chipping away at the right of the people to refuse medical interventions.  The strategy, led by California, has been to go state by state, passing laws that make toxic childhood vaccinations mandatory.

But now, that strategy, in South Dakota, has been turned around.  It’s a spark that has to be nurtured, and blown into a flame that will signal other states to follow suit.

For those who have forgotten, the Constitution was originally ratified by the newly created states, through their legislatures.  The states were giving up certain enumerated powers to the new federal government.  This was not a mere formality.  The states were not puppets of central government.  In principle, they still aren’t.  Those who now want to wipe away states in favor of one great melted cheese glob of a nation know exactly what they’re doing.

They’re trying to eradicate one of the last safeguards against overarching federal power.

In the meantime, they’re using their resources to turn the states into captured entities, which rubber stamp every covert and overt control op dispensed from Above.

“They” go by various names.  The deep state.  Globalists.  Corporate statists.  Technocrats.  They find it deeply embarrassing that, while they’re trying to turn the WORLD into one vast interlocked corporation, here in the US they’re still dealing with separate states.  How can that be?

Why doesn’t every state officially surrender every shred of power to Washington and huddle like abject losers on the steps of federal buildings, openly howling and begging for dollars?

Actually, to an alarming degree, that’s already the case.  But in the darkness, there are a few flashlights burning.

It’s still very early in the South Dakota legislative process, for this new bill.  The outcome isn’t guaranteed.  But something has broken through the layers of federal/corporate mold and fungus—NO ONE CAN FORCE A PERSON TO SUBMIT TO MEDICAL INTERVENTIONS OF ANY KIND.

Yippee-ki-yay, mother*****r.

The game is afoot.

The game is never, ever over.

Jon Rappoport [email protected]

Vaccine Big Brother Goes Full Fascist

MONEY corrupted SCIENCE | IPCC Global warming & Agenda 21/30 | Club of Rome – UN Globalism

The problem was created by the club of Rome..the club of crisis creators.All they needed was a crisis/problem that will unite the world…so they created global warming! now a one world government is around the corner!

The Real Truth Behind Flu Shots

The Real Truth Behind Flu Shots

Discover the simple inexpensive alternative to the flu vaccine that is far safer and more effective. Vitamin D (watch the video)

Vaccine for the China virus

The planet is the guinea pig for a vast experiment

Vaccine for the China virus The planet is the guinea pig for a vast experiment

The US National Institutes of Health (NIH) is launching a rush program to develop a vaccine against the China coronavirus.

The goal? Have a vaccine ready for human testing in an unprecedented 90 days.

NIH is partnering with a US vaccine company, Moderna, Inc.

The vaccine is a new type called RNA. According to Reuters (“With Wuhan virus genetic code in hand, scientists begin work on a vaccine,” Jan 24, 2020), “[these are] vaccines based on ribonucleic acid (RNA)—a chemical messenger that contains instructions for making proteins.”

The PHG Foundation/University of Cambridge explains further: “Unlike a normal vaccine, RNA vaccines work by introducing an mRNA sequence (the molecule which tells cells what to build) which is coded for a disease specific antigen [virus]; once produced within the body, the antigen [virus] is recognised by the immune system, preparing it to fight the real thing.”

Let’s have a look at Moderna, the company that will be making and testing the new RNA vaccine against the China coronavirus. Its website states, in a January 23rd press release: “Moderna Announces Funding Award from CEPI to Accelerate Development of Messenger RNA (mRNA) Vaccine Against Novel Coronavirus”.

Funded by CEPI. Who is that? Its website states: “CEPI is a innovative global partnership between public, private, philanthropic, and civil society organisations. We’re working together to accelerate the development of vaccines against emerging infectious diseases and enable equitable access to these vaccines for people during outbreaks.”

A more relevant quote: “CEPI was founded in Davos by the governments of Norway and India, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Wellcome Trust, and the World Economic Forum.”

Bill Gates. Doesn’t that send your trust and faith rocketing up into the sky?

There is more. Going back to the Moderna Inc. website—at the bottom of the press release referenced above, we find a VERY interesting statement, in a section titled, “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements”: “…there has never been a commercial product utilizing mRNA technology approved for use…”

And there you have it. The vaccine that is being tapped by the US government… under its National Institutes of Health…through drug company Moderna…HAS NEVER BEEN USED ON THE PUBLIC BEFORE. IT IS NOT LICENSED FOR PUBLIC USE.

RNA VACCINES AND THE TECHNOLOGY THEY USE ARE ENTIRELY EXPERIMENTAL.

AND THIS IS THE TYPE OF VACCINE BEING RUSHED INTO EXISTENCE IN 90 DAYS.

What in the world could possibly go wrong?

One way to find out is to unleash it on millions of people, stand back, and see.

The PHG Foundation at the University of Cambridge gives us a substantial clue: “… better understanding of [RNA] vaccine adverse effects is needed – these can include inflammation or autoimmune reactions.”

Autoimmune reactions—the human immune system attacks healthy elements and processes of the body itself. The body goes to war with itself.

I’m sure you would volunteer for a test run of the vaccine, right? You would certainly offer up your child for a grand experiment, wouldn’t you?

And if you’re a doctor reading this, you’ll definitely inject the vaccine into unsuspecting patients, won’t you? Conscience is such an annoyance, isn’t it?

ISN’T IT?

Don’t you want to have the whole world as your guinea pig?

Jon Rappoport

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

New China virus, Swine Flu hoax, history matters
I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but…history matters.  

New China virus, Swine Flu hoax, history matters

When you see a new story on the horizon, and it looks a lot like an old story you know was a hoax, you have to dig up that history and report it.

Yes, many people hate history.  It tends to stretch their attention spans, which are rooted in the present, where the action is: Twitter, Facebook, Instagram—little crumbs of NOW and NOW and NOW.

Oh well.  Here we go, back into the Dark Age of 2009, an ancient time.

What was happening then?  There was a grim pandemic spreading like an angry cloud over the world, threatening to kill millions of people.  Sound familiar?  Sound like China right now?  It was called Swine Flu.

Just like now, the 2009 announcements were coming out of the World Health Organization and the CDC; the germ was a virus; it was spreading; travelers were carrying it; people were being tested at airports; the source of the germ seemed to be animal-to-human transmission; deaths were being reported; fear was rising.  People were saying, THIS IS THE BIG ONE.  Other people were saying: THIS IS A WEAPONIZED VIRUS ALTERED IN A BIOWAR LAB.  Just like now.

So here is what I wrote about the 2009 Swine Flu pandemic in its aftermath—I hope you can shake off the idea that the following facts are IMPOSSIBLE, “THE AITHORITIES WOULD NEVER HAVE DONE THAT,” IT COULDN’T HAVE HAPPENED.  The following facts are possible and true, the authorities did do that, and it did happen:

In the late summer of 2009, the Swine Flu epidemic was hyped to the sky by the CDC [and the World Health Organization]. The CDC was calling for all Americans to take the Swine Flu vaccine.

The problem was, the CDC was concealing a scandal.

At the time, star CBS investigative reporter, Sharyl Attkisson, was working on a Swine Flu story. She discovered that the CDC had secretly stopped counting US cases of the illness—while, of course, continuing to warn Americans about its unchecked spread.

Understand that the CDC’s main job is counting cases and reporting the numbers.

What was the Agency up to?

Here is an excerpt from my 2014 interview with Sharyl Attkisson:

Rappoport: In 2009, you spearheaded coverage of the so-called Swine Flu pandemic. You discovered that, in the summer of 2009, the Centers for Disease Control, ignoring their federal mandate, [secretly] stopped counting Swine Flu cases in America. Yet they continued to stir up fear about the “pandemic,” without having any real measure of its impact. Wasn’t that another investigation of yours that was shut down? Wasn’t there more to find out?

Attkisson: The implications of the story were even worse than that. We discovered through our FOI efforts that before the CDC mysteriously stopped counting Swine Flu cases, they had learned that almost none of the cases they had counted as Swine Flu was, in fact, Swine Flu or any sort of flu at all! The interest in the story from one [CBS] executive was very enthusiastic. He said it was “the most original story” he’d seen on the whole Swine Flu epidemic. But others pushed to stop it [after it was published on the CBS News website] and, in the end, no [CBS television news] broadcast wanted to touch it. We aired numerous stories pumping up the idea of an epidemic, but not the one that would shed original, new light on all the hype. It [Attkisson’s article] was fair, accurate, legally approved and a heck of a story. With the CDC keeping the true Swine Flu stats secret, it meant that many in the public took and gave their children an experimental vaccine that may not have been necessary.

—end of interview excerpt—

It was routine for doctors all over America to send blood samples from patients they’d diagnosed with Swine Flu, or the “most likely” Swine Flu patients, to labs for testing. And overwhelmingly, those samples were coming back with the result: not Swine Flu, not any kind of flu.

That was the big secret. That’s what the CDC was hiding. That’s why they stopped reporting Swine Flu case numbers. That’s what Attkisson had discovered. That’s why she was shut down.

But it gets even worse.

Because about three weeks after Attkisson’s findings were published on the CBS News website, the CDC, obviously in a panic, decided to double down. If one lie is exposed, tell an even bigger one. A much bigger one.

Here, from a November 12, 2009, WebMD article is the CDC’s response: “Shockingly, 14 million to 34 million U.S. residents – the CDC’s best guess is 22 million – came down with H1N1 swine flu by Oct. 17 [2009].” (“22 million cases of Swine Flu in US,” by Daniel J. DeNoon).

Are your eyeballs popping? They should be.

In the summer of 2009, the CDC secretly stops counting Swine Flu cases in America, because the overwhelming percentage of lab tests from likely Swine Flu patients shows no sign of Swine Flu or any other kind of flu.

There is no Swine Flu epidemic.

Then, the CDC estimates there are 22 MILLION cases of Swine Flu in the US.

So…the premise that the CDC would never lie about important matters like, oh, a vaccine causing autism…you can lay that one to rest.

The CDC will lie about anything it wants to. It will boldly go where no person interested in real science will go.

—That’s what I wrote about the Swine Flu fraud years ago.

I reprint it here to give people some perspective on what health agencies like the CDC and the World Health Organization will do to pump up the idea (not the reality) of an epidemic.

Now, if you don’t mind, I’ll blow my own horn a little.  After the mind-blowing revelations Sharyl Attkisson exposed in print, in 2009, about the Swine Flu hoax, how many other reporters understood the implications and followed up by writing their own stories and pressing home the astonishing hoax?  How many interviewed Attkisson and hammered on her findings and spread the facts far and wide?  How many went all-out to emphasize the outrageous guilt of the CDC on this scandal?

Most reporters, when an epidemic is announced, take the bait.  Automatically.  They fall for the con and the hustle like rookies going to Vegas for the first time, thinking they’re going to score at the betting tables.  They make the crucial mistake of believing that some virus has really been discovered, and it is about to wreak havoc in the population.

A new virus story always sounds good.  It will have legs.  People will want to know about it.  Some reporters—blithely accepting the existence and dire impact of a virus—will take that ball and run with it into new territory: “the virus was created in a lab.”  They don’t stop and consider the possibility (confirmed by history) that the hoax goes all the way to the bottom—no virus was actually discovered, or if it was, there is a zero proof that it’s harmful.  They miss that vital step.

There is more to discuss along this line—and I have, in print.  It involves asking the questions, “How do researchers actually isolate a new virus and identify it?” and, “What are the correct standards for proving a particular germ causes a particular disease?”  When you ask those questions and pursue the answers, you find yourself wading hip-deep in a swamp.  The garbage floating around you is formidable.  Everybody and his brother in the official medical community has answers, and most of them turn out to be self-serving propaganda, not science.  It’s as if you’re hearing: THE WAY TO ISOLATE A VIRUS AND PROVE IT CAUSES A PARTICULAR DISEASE IS THE WAY WE SAID WE DID IT.  NOW DON’T BOTHER US ANYMORE.

But it turns out that bothering is good.  Necessary.