Drilling down into flu deceptions and mind-boggling lies

by Jon Rappoport

November 11, 2019

Not every mainstream medical professional is trying to lie about the flu.

Most of these people, as a result of their indoctrination, simply assume conventional wisdom is true.

But as you move toward the top of the ladder—for example, public health agencies like the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC)—there are definitely some first-class liars on board.

The information I’m about to spring on you—and I’ve posted this before—is in the category of: HOW CAN THAT BE TRUE? IF THAT WERE TRUE, THEN EVERYTHING I’VE BEEN TOLD AND EVERYTHING I’VE BELIEVED IS INCREDIBLY FALSE.

And that’s a problem for many people. They would rather hold on to a falsehood than shift allegiance to the truth, when the truth makes them view authority figures in a whole new light.

So…buckle up. Here we go.

The first issue is: how many people in the US die every year from the flu?

The CDC used to issue the same figure every year; 36,000. Then they modified that rote estimate, when it was finally challenged. They equivocated: “Flu seasons are unpredictable and can be severe. Over a period of 30 years, between 1976 and 2006, estimates of flu-associated deaths in the United States range from a low of about 3,000 to a high of about 49,000 people.”

In December of 2005, the British Medical Journal (online) published a shocking report by Peter Doshi, which created tremors through the halls of the CDC.

Here is a quote from Doshi’s report, “Are US flu death figures more PR than science?” (BMJ 2005; 331:1412):

“[According to CDC statistics], ‘influenza and pneumonia’ took 62,034 lives in 2001—61,777 of which were attributable to pneumonia and 257 to flu, and in only 18 cases was the flu virus positively identified.”


You see, the CDC created one overall category that combines both flu and pneumonia deaths. Why do they do this? Because they disingenuously assume that the pneumonia deaths are complications stemming from the flu.

This is an absurd assumption. Pneumonia has a number of causes.

But even worse, in all the flu and pneumonia deaths, only 18 revealed the presence of an influenza virus.

Therefore, the CDC could not say, with assurance, that more than 18 people died of influenza in 2001. Not 36,000 deaths. 18 deaths.

Doshi continued his assessment of published CDC flu-death statistics: “Between 1979 and 2001, [CDC] data show an average of 1348 [flu] deaths per year (range 257 to 3006).” These figures refer to flu separated out from pneumonia.

This death toll is obviously far lower than the parroted 36,000 figure.

However, when you add the sensible condition that lab tests have to actually find the flu virus in patients, the numbers of flu deaths would plummet even further.

In other words, it’s promotion, hype, and uncertainty.

“Well, uh, we’ve said that 36,000 people die from the flu every year in the US. But actually, it’s probably closer to 20. Who knows? However, we can’t admit that, because if we did, we’d be exposing our gigantic psyop. The whole campaign to scare people into getting a flu shot would have about the same effect as warning people to carry iron umbrellas, in case toasters fall out of upper-story windows…and, by the way, we’d be put in prison for fraud.”

[Note: Prior to Doshi publishing the above piece about flu deaths, I engaged in a series of emails with him about that issue, and independent researcher, Martin Maloney, made a major contribution to uncovering the CDC deception.]

The second big issue is: how many people diagnosed with the flu really have the flu?

Peter Doshi again, writing in the online BMJ (British Medical Journal), reveals another monstrosity.

As Doshi states, every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory samples are taken from flu patients in the US and tested in labs. Here is the kicker: only a small percentage of these samples show the presence of a flu virus.

This means: most of the people in America who are diagnosed by doctors with the flu have no flu virus in their bodies.

So they don’t have the flu.

Therefore, even if you assume the flu vaccine is useful and safe, it couldn’t possibly prevent all those “flu cases” that aren’t flu cases.

The vaccine couldn’t possibly work.

The vaccine isn’t designed to prevent fake flu, unless pigs can fly.

Here’s the exact quote from Doshi’s BMJ review, “Influenza: marketing vaccines by marketing disease” (BMJ 2013; 346:f3037):

“…even the ideal influenza vaccine, matched perfectly to circulating strains of wild influenza and capable of stopping all influenza viruses, can only deal with a small part of the ‘flu’ problem because most ‘flu’ appears to have nothing to do with influenza. Every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory specimens are tested across the US. Of those tested, on average 16% are found to be influenza positive.

“…It’s no wonder so many people feel that ‘flu shots’ don’t work: for most flus, they can’t.”

Because most diagnosed cases of the flu aren’t the flu.

So even if you’re a true believer in mainstream vaccine theory, you’re on the short end of the stick here. They’re conning your socks off.

Let me give you a gigantic example of this massive flu-case-counting deception. It involved a flu “epidemic” you might remember called Swine Flu.

In the late summer of 2009, the Swine Flu epidemic was hyped to the sky by the CDC. The Agency was calling for all Americans to take the Swine Flu vaccine.

The problem was, the CDC was concealing a scandal.

At the time, star CBS investigative reporter, Sharyl Attkisson, was working on a Swine Flu story. She discovered that the CDC had secretly stopped counting US cases of the illness—while, of course, continuing to warn Americans about its unchecked spread.

Understand that the CDC’s main job is counting cases and reporting the numbers.

What was the Agency up to?

Here is an excerpt from my 2014 interview with Sharyl Attkisson:

Rappoport: In 2009, you spearheaded coverage of the so-called Swine Flu pandemic. You discovered that, in the summer of 2009, the Centers for Disease Control, ignoring their federal mandate, [secretly] stopped counting Swine Flu cases in America. Yet they continued to stir up fear about the “pandemic,” without having any real measure of its impact. Wasn’t that another investigation of yours that was shut down? Wasn’t there more to find out?

Attkisson: The implications of the story were even worse than that. We discovered through our FOI efforts that before the CDC mysteriously stopped counting Swine Flu cases, they had learned that almost none of the cases they had counted as Swine Flu was, in fact, Swine Flu or any sort of flu at all! The interest in the story from one [CBS] executive was very enthusiastic. He said it was “the most original story” he’d seen on the whole Swine Flu epidemic. But others pushed to stop it [after it was published on the CBS News website] and, in the end, no [CBS television news] broadcast wanted to touch it. We aired numerous stories pumping up the idea of an epidemic, but not the one that would shed original, new light on all the hype. It [Attkisson’s article] was fair, accurate, legally approved and a heck of a story. With the CDC keeping the true Swine Flu stats secret, it meant that many in the public took and gave their children an experimental vaccine that may not have been necessary.

—end of interview excerpt—

It was routine for doctors all over America to send blood samples from patients they’d diagnosed with Swine Flu, or the “most likely” Swine Flu patients, to labs for testing. And overwhelmingly, those samples were coming back with the result: not Swine Flu, not any kind of flu.

That was the big secret. That’s what the CDC was hiding. That’s why they stopped reporting Swine Flu case numbers. That’s what Attkisson had discovered. That’s why she was shut down.

But it gets even worse.

Because about three weeks after Attkisson’s findings were published on the CBS News website, the CDC, obviously in a panic, decided to double down. If one lie is exposed, tell an even bigger one. A much bigger one.

Here, from a November 12, 2009, WebMD article is the CDC’s response: “Shockingly, 14 million to 34 million U.S. residents — the CDC’s best guess is 22 million — came down with H1N1 swine flu by Oct. 17 [2009].” (“22 million cases of Swine Flu in US,” by Daniel J. DeNoon).

Are your eyeballs popping? They should be.

In the summer of 2009, the CDC secretly stops counting Swine Flu cases in America, because the overwhelming percentage of lab tests from likely Swine Flu patients shows no sign of Swine Flu or any other kind of flu.

There is no Swine Flu epidemic.

Then, the CDC estimates there are 22 MILLION cases of Swine Flu in the US.

So…the premise that the CDC would never lie about important matters like, oh, a vaccine causing autism…you can lay that one to rest.

The CDC will lie about anything it wants to. It will boldly go where no person interested in real science will go.

It will completely ignore its mandate to care about human health, and it will get away with it—as long as people are willing to accept falsehoods instead of the truth, as long as people would rather cling to what authority figures tell them.

Vaccinated vs Unvaccinated Study (Preemies in Vaxxed/Unvaxxed | Vaccines: Their Safety, Effectiveness, and Risks)

Preemies in Vaxxed/Unvaxxed | Vaccines: Their Safety, Effectiveness, and Risks

Pilot comparative study on the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated 6- to 12-year-old U.S. children


Vaccine Documentary (VAXXED) Anti-vax documentaries have disappeared from search results on the platform, and appear to no longer be available to Prime members for free streaming. Around noon Eastern Time, California Rep. Adam Schiff published an open letter to Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos asking that Amazon reconsider allowing anti-vax content to appear on its website. “Amazon is surfacing and recommending products and content that discourage parents from vaccinating their children, a direct threat to public health, and reversing progress made in tackling vaccine-preventable diseases,” Schiff’s letter reads. Schiff had written similar letters to both Google, which owns YouTube, and Facebook, asking those platforms to address the anti-vax issue, in part because of the ongoing measles outbreak in Washington state. Following Schiff’s letter, YouTube banned advertising on some anti-vax videos and added additional information panels about vaccine hesitancy to anti-vax videos. Previously, the company announced via a blog post that it’s working to down-rank conspiracy theories in its “Up Next” recommendations. Facebook also says it’s “currently working on additional changes” to “reduce the distribution of health-related misinformation on Facebook,” and will announce “additional changes” soon…

Silent Epidemic, by award winning film director Gary Null, is the first documentary to investigate thoroughly the true medical record and the historical evidence about vaccine marvels. Conventional medicine has herald the invention of vaccines as a miracle of modern science. It claims that vaccines have been proven to prevent and eradicate infectious diseases. We are told that vaccines are safe and effective, and that “herd immunity” can be achieved if a high percentage of a population is vaccinated. However, does the science support these claims and what are the untold consequences?

The Covert Cull


How the Elite World Government Plan to reduce the World Population (Cull it)

Reducing the world’s population has always been one of the main agendas of the elite. One simply has to look at some of the quotes from these people to see what their attitude is towards the rest of us. Mary Sanger, for example, founder of the Planned Parenthood, never hid her disgust with the human race –

“The most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”

Another one of her many sickening quotes is as follows –

“Feeble-minded persons, habitual congenital criminals, those afflicted with inheritable disease, and others found biologically unfit by authorities qualified judge should be sterilized or, in cases of doubt, should be so isolated as to prevent the perpetuation of their afflictions by breeding.”

Planned Parenthood is a pro-choice advocate that performs over 300,000 abortions every year. However, as can be seen by the words of its founder, it has its roots in eugenics and the hatred of the human race. It was recently found to be selling aborted baby parts for profit, which tells you all you need to know.

To emphasise how important this group is to the elite’s agenda one only has to see the companies that donate to it – Monsanto, JP Morgan, Microsoft, General Electric, Bank of America, Shell, BP, Pfizer, Pepsi, American Express – in other words some of the richest people on the planet. It is also a big hit with celebrities and receives vast amounts of money from the US government.

Then there are the Rockefellers. They have accumulated their extreme wealth via the oil and banking industries and have been highly influential in education, politics, and medicine.

One of their dynasty, John D Rockefeller, said, “If we do not make voluntary family planning possible in this generation, we may make compulsory family planning inevitable for future generations.”

Prince Philip of the British Royal Family is also a big supporter of culling the population. He once said –

“In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation.”

Charles Darwin, lauded by most as one of the most distinguished naturalists and biologists of our time, but in reality, a renowned eugenicist, said –

“Thus the weak members of civilised societies propagate their kind. No one who has attended to the breeding of domestic animals will doubt that this must be highly injurious to the race of man.”

John Holdren, who President Obama appointed as Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, is a staunch supporter of forced sterilisation, even advocating putting sterilising chemicals in our drinking water.

He has also said –

“The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.”

David Brower, founder of various environmental movements and 3 times nominated for the Nobel peace prize, thought along the same lines as Mary Sanger when it came to having children –

“Childbearing [should be] a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license… All potential parents [should be] required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.”

Dr Eric Pianka is an evolutionary ecologist. At a lecture to the Texas Academy of Science in 2006 he advocated the murder of 90% of the world’s population. As quoted by a journalist who attended the event –

“War and famine were insufficient for solving global overpopulation, he explained. Instead, disease was far more efficient and swift. At this point, Pianka displayed a slide showing rows of human skulls.”

“AIDS took too long to kill people off, he explained. His preferred method of exterminating over five billion human beings was via airborne Ebola (Ebola Reston), because it is both highly lethal and kills its victims in days rather than years.”

The most chilling fact about the above incident is that his speech was not greeted by shouts of disapproval but a by a loud round of enthusiastic applause by his academic peers. This emphasises just how much influence the psychopathic de-population zealots have when they can talk about culling billions of people and are warmly embraced by academia for doing so.

The following is one of the most horrific and disturbing quotes of all, from a paper by Italian professors published in the British Medical Journal. In it, the authors propose that murdering newborn infants is totally acceptable as they are not really human –

“By showing that (1) both fetuses and newborns do not have the same moral status as actual persons, (2) the fact that both are potential persons is morally irrelevant and (3) adoption is not always in the best interest of actual people, the authors argue that what we call ‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a newborn) should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not disabled.”

The elite’s modus operandi usually involves the instigation of wars under various pretences such as humanitarian missions or for national security reasons. They are aided in these ventures by their propaganda arm – the mainstream media.

However, the elite also uses more subtle methods to reduce the population. Ironically, despite the fact that they use the destruction of the environment as the main reason why they need population control, they are actually poisoning our water, air and food to make us infertile. That and the increasing use of toxic medications are the weapons of their covert war upon us.


Vaccines are hazardous to health on many levels but they also have a deleterious effect on human fertility due to their toxic ingredients.


Mercury, in the form of thimerosal, is used in some vaccines as a preservative.  This toxic metal has well established anti-fertility properties as it has been used as a spermicide. Furthermore, a group of Hong Kong based scientists found that infertile couples had significantly higher blood mercury levels compared to fertile ones. They suggested various mechanisms to account for this. These included the fact that cells in different areas of the male reproductive system are binding sites for mercury and that mercury affects the membranes of sperm and disrupts mitochondria function. The report also suggested that mercury may damage the ovaries leading to lower quality of egg-forming cells.  Other studies have shown mercury to reduce sperm motility, testosterone levels and damage the DNA of spermatozoa.

Mercury is also known to cause damage to foetuses. According to an article in Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care –

“The fetus and infant are especially vulnerable to mercury exposures…….Damage of the nervous system caused by mercury is likely to be permanent. Neurotoxic effects can result from prenatal or early postnatal exposure.”

Therefore, knowing the elite’s agenda, it is easy to understand why flu vaccines, containing thimerosal, are recommended to pregnant women. Otherwise, it would simply be inexplicable.


Aluminium is another toxic ingredient used in numerous vaccines as an adjuvant to increase the immune response to the vaccine.

A joint study by English and French scientists has found that men with higher concentrations of aluminium had lower sperm counts.  Another study on rats found that aluminium caused a significant reduction in the number of sperm, sperm motility and morphology probably due to oxidative damage. Other studies on the reproductive systems of animals exposed to aluminium have also concluded that oxidative stress is a major factor in reduced male fertility in addition to other mechanisms such as disruption of cell signalling, inhibition of certain enzyme activity, alterations in membrane function and impairment of the blood testis barrier.

It has been well established that aluminium is known to cause infertility as it has been used, in the form of aluminium chloride, to induce infertility in laboratory animals.

Again, knowing the elite’s desire to reduce the population, one can see why aluminium is added to vaccines.

Polysorbate 80

Polysorbate 80, also known as Tween 80, is used as an emulsifier in vaccines and has been shown to inhibit the production of testosterone. A study in rats discovered that polysorbate 80 caused damage to the uterus and ovaries. Moreover, there is actually a patent for a vaccine that deliberately causes infertility in animals and Tween 80 is specifically mentioned as a preferred ingredient.

Triton X-100

Triton X-100, also known as octoxynol 9, is used as a detergent in vaccines. It is also a potent spermicide. In a test on rams’ sperm, triton x-100 completely immobilised them whilst also destroying their plasma membranes. Once again, the destructive effect of Triton X 100 on sperm is well known as it is used as a spermicide in contraceptives and has 100% effectiveness in stripping the cytoplasm of human spermatozoa.

Benzethonium Chloride

This chemical is used only in the anthrax vaccine given to military personnel. This vaccine has been linked to Gulf War Syndrome, a multi-symptom illness akin to chronic fatigue syndrome.  However, one ingredient of the anthrax vaccine, benzethonium chloride, an antimicrobial agent, is a known potent spermicide. Interestingly, US military personnel have higher rates of infertility than the general populace and those that served in the Gulf are higher still.


Formaldehyde is used to inactivate live viruses and bacteria in vaccines. Apart from being a carcinogen, it has deleterious effects on fertility.

A paper produced in the Mutation Research journal found –

“…evidence of an association between formaldehyde exposure and adverse reproductive and developmental effects” and “positive associations between formaldehyde exposure and reproductive toxicity, mostly in males.”

The authors of the paper conclude –

“human reproductive and developmental toxicities resulting from formaldehyde exposure could potentially be a threat to human health.”

A Chinese study concluded that exposure to formaldehyde increased the risk of miscarriage. Even the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) accept that working with formaldehyde could increase fertility problems or the chances of having a miscarriage. However, the same CDC are ardent supporters of vaccines and promote them as safe, even though they are aware that some of them contain formaldehyde, including the flu vaccine, which they recommend to pregnant women.

Evidence that Vaccines Cause Infertility

The HPV vaccine is one of the most dangerous vaccines on the market. Apart from the long list of serious health issues it causes, it also adversely affects fertility. It can cause ovarian failure and, according to a study in The Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, females who had been injected with the vaccine had lower rates of pregnancy.

The flu vaccine, recommended to pregnant women, has been associated with spontaneous abortions. In fact, there was a 4250% increase in foetal deaths after administration of the flu vaccine between 2009 and 2010.

As evidence that the authorities are deliberately trying to induce infertility via vaccines, a scientific paper was published in 2017 revealing that in 2014 a widespread vaccine program in Kenya was actually a cover for trying to sterilise the female population of the country.

The Catholic Church had raised concerns that the tetanus toxoid (TT) vaccine being used in Kenya by the World Health Organisation had human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) as one of its ingredients.  HCG and TT can cause abortions and infertility. This had been known for years as a TT and hCG vaccine had already been proposed as an actual vaccine for birth control. They tested the Kenyan vaccines in various different laboratories and did indeed find hCG present. The only conclusion that can be drawn is that it was a deliberate attempt at birth control without the recipient’s consent.

If further proof was needed, there is the famous speech by Bill Gates, one of the world’s foremost pro-vaccine zealots, where he lists vaccines as one of the measures used to reduce the population.

Food Additives

Monosodium Glutamate (MSG)

Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) is another ingredient in vaccines but is mostly known as a flavour enhancer used in a multitude of foodstuffs. Again, MSG’s infertility properties are well known as it is actually used to induce infertility in laboratory animals. MSG fed to rats have caused degenerative damage to the cells of the ovaries and it has also caused testicular damage in rats due to oxidative stress, leading to low sperm counts and detrimental changes to the sperm morphology.


Aspartame, an artificial sweetener is associated with a host of dangerous side effects including cancer, multiple sclerosis, seizures, depression and ADHD. It also has a negative impact on fertility.

According to one fertility expert, taking large amounts of aspartame can cause infertility and miscarriages. It can also cause ovulatory disorders and lead to a 90% chance of ovum and sperm cells dying if consumed in excessive amounts. Another medical professional, Dr Teresa Hill, has also stated that aspartame can cause miscarriages and infertility and proposes this is due to the fact that aspartame breaks down into phenylalanine and methanol, two substances that foetal tissue cannot tolerate. Furthermore, the Indian Science Journal has stated that aspartame reduced sperm motility and caused structural damage to the testis of rats.

 Food Colourings

Tartrazine is the chemical used to make foods yellow. In tests on mice, it caused a decrease in sperm numbers and motility, sperm abnormalities and damage to the testes. Similar results were found in rats. One of the mechanisms mentioned was the zinc-depleting effect of tartrazine. This led to “testicular atrophy and reductions in libido and sperm production and atrophy of seminiferous tubules and complete inhibition of spermatogenesis.” Another mechanism highlighted in the study wastartrazine’s ability to cause oxidative stress, which damages the membrane of the sperm and causes structural damage to the testes.

Carmoisine or azurobine is a red colour food dye. In rat studies it caused alterations to ovary cells and reduced the number of ovarian follicles. It also caused the ovaries to be smaller.

Red 40, also known as Allura red, is another food dye that has detrimental effects on fertility. In rats, it has been shown to significantly reduce reproductive success, offspring weight and survival rates of offspring.

Sodium Benzoate

Sodium Benzoate is used as a preservative in food. Unfortunately it can have a detrimental affect on fertility. Male rats given sodium benzoate had significantly reduced sperm numbers and sperm motility. Sodium benzoate also decreased the number of hormones essential for sperm production. A further study showed that feeding sodium benzoate to pregnant mice resulted in foetal malformations such as haemorrhages, limb defects, craniofacial defects, vertebral column deformities and neural tube defects.

Genetically Modified Food

Genetically modified food has had its DNA altered or had genes of different species such as bacteria and viruses added to it. It poses one of the biggest threats to human health as the long term effects of creating non natural organisms is totally unknown and unpredictable. One thing that is known is that GMOs can adversely affect fertility.

Numerous studies of GM food have shown fertility related problems.Female rats fed GM food showed mutations to their uterus and ovaries. More than 50% of babies of mother rats fed GM food died within three weeks of birth. Mice fed GM corn had fewer offspring. Hamsters that were fed GM soy for two years lost the ability to reproduce and pigs fed GM corn became sterile.

In case anyone thinks infertility is just an unfortunate side effect of GMOs then think again. A biotechnology company called Epicyte developed ‘contraceptive corn’ that contains antibodies to sperm. This company was eventually bought over by Monsanto, the greatest suppliers of GM crops in the world. So why would a biotech food company want contraceptive corn?  There is only one answer – to depopulate the planet.

It is no surprise to find that Bill Gates has invested vast sums of money in Monsanto.  As already noted, the vaccine zealot has already stated that vaccines reduce the population so it is obvious he would be interested in getting involved in supplying contraceptive corn to help with the agenda. Neither is it a surprise to learn that Bill Gates’ father was once head of the notorious eugenics organisation, Planned Parenthood mentioned previously.

Round-Up is the main pesticide used with GM crops. It has also shown to be detrimental to fertility. A study has shown that Round-Up damaged testosterone-producing cells in rats after just 1 hour’s exposure. In addition, Argentinian researchers have found that after only 7 days exposure, glyphosate, Round-Up’s main active ingredient, disrupts the development of the uterus in female rats. It should also be noted that vaccines are also contaminated with glyphosate.


Fluoridation of the public water supply is used extensively in the United States, Australia and the Republic of Ireland and in some parts of the United Kingdom on the false pretext that it prevents dental caries.  In reality, apart from causing cancer, thyroid problems, osteoporosis, skeletal and dental fluorosis, it also causes infertility.

A 2005 study investigating the effects of fluoride in drinking water on rats concluded that, “A significant decrease in sperm count, sperm motility, sperm viability and sperm function ….with increased sperm abnormalities was also observed in NaF-exposed male rats.”

A 2006 study on ram semen found that reasonably low levels of fluoride can decrease the motility of sperm. A further study showed that fluoride could cause structural damage to the reproductive organs of rabbits possibly leading to weakened spermatozoa.

In humans, it was found that patients with skeletal fluorosis had significantly lower levels of testosterone than people without the condition.

Where female fertility is concerned, there are a number of studies linking fluoride to various problems associated with infertility.

A meta-analysis study looked at the correlation between annual fertility rates and fluoride in drinking water and confirmed that areas that had fluoridated water had decreased fertility rates. A study carried out on rats linked fluoride exposure to ovarian and uterine structural damage which could significantly reduce their fertility.  Another study found an association between women working with fluoride compounds and a higher risk of spontaneous abortion.


Until recently, the mainstream media denied all knowledge of the chemical spraying of our skies. Now, because it is too obvious to be ignored, they are admitting that it is happening but it’s all for our own good. It is to counteract the myth of human-caused global warming and they call it geo-engineering. Aluminium is one of the substances they are using. As already noted in the section on vaccines, aluminium can cause infertility and, if it is dispersed by aeroplane, we will be ingesting it infar higher quantities than ever before.

Tests on rain water samples have also shown that the earth is being bathed in barium. Barium has been shown to adversely affect the motility and morphology of sperm in animal tests.

Interestingly NASA is also spreading aluminium and barium into the upper atmosphere, allegedly to aid in viewing ionised particles. In addition they are also dumping lithium into the atmosphere.

Lithium is another element that has a well-known adverse effect on fertility. Tests on rodents have shown devastating effects of lithium on their reproductive ability. The rate of spermatogenesis and sperm quality were reduced, leydig cells, the cells that produce testosterone, were destroyed, and sperm motility was significantly reduced. It also disrupted the development of sexual cells and the maturation of spermatozoa.  In another test, when male rats exposed to lithium mated with normal female rats the fertility rates were reduced by 50%, even after the lithium exposure was removed. In human tests, lithium has also been shown to reduce the motility of human sperm

Lithium is also used as a medication to treat bi-polar disorder. Because of its alleged positive effect on mental health, the mainstream media have frequently promoted the idea of forcibly medicating us all by adding it to the water supply, just as they have done with  fluoride.

Radio Frequency Radiation

The planet is currently swamped with artificially generated electromagnetic fields. Of these, the most dangerous are those at the higher frequency range such as radio frequency waves. These are emitted by cell phones, mobile phone towers, smart –meters and Wi-Fi networks. The health hazards associated with these have been well-known for some time despite governments and telecommunication companies refusing to accept the science. One of those hazards is the ability of radio frequency waves to affect fertility.

A study carried out on rats on the adverse effects of 4G mobile phone radiation concluded by saying it –

“had a harmful effect on spermatogenesis. In particular, the sperm and Leydig cell counts significantly decreased in the long duration exposure group, showing that continuous cell phone use could be hazardous for fertile men, especially adolescent men. “

An Argentinian study to evaluate the impact of Wi-Fi lap tops on sperm discovered there was a significant decrease in sperm motility and an increase in sperm DNA fragmentation.  In conclusion they said –

“We speculate that keeping a laptop connected wirelessly to the internet on the lap near the testes may result in decreased male fertility.”

A paper in ‘Cell Journal’ again highlights the dangers of Wi-Fi radiation on the reproductive system. The authors noted that sperm concentration, motility and morphology were affected significantly with exposure to a Wi-Fi antenna. Another journal has listed numerous studies which show significantly decreased sperm counts, motility and testosterone levels and increases in abnormal cells and DNA damage due to exposure to radio frequency radiation. One of the main reasons given for this damage is oxidative stress.

It isn’t just the male reproductive system that RF radiation affects. It also impairs female fertility. The journal, Reproductive Toxicology, states that RF radiation     causes –

“uteroplacental circulatory disturbances and ovarian and placental dysfunction during pregnancy”.

Another study carried out on mice concluded that microwave radiation at 2.45Ghz, the frequency of Wi-Fi, can lead to deformed embryos and abnormal pregnancies.

In a human study, conducted on pregnant women in California, it was found that woman exposed to higher levels of RF radiation were three times more likely to have  a miscarriage than those woman exposed to lower levels.

The Myth of Overpopulation

The global elite, via their mainstream news minions, are for ever telling us that overpopulation is a major issue and needs to be reduced and have used the many aforementioned covert methods to achieve this. However, in the last 40 years, sperms counts in Western countries have actually decreased by more than 50%. The World Health Organisation have even declared that infertility is now a global health issue, with 10% of the world’s female population now suffering from infertility problems. In fact, according to recent reports, 50% of the world’s nations have fertility rates that are now too low to sustain their population.

The threat of overpopulation is simply a myth to enable the elite to reduce our numbers and the reason is obvious. A vastly reduced populace is easier to control.

Fear and fake news has been, and always will be, part of the elite’s modus operandi, it would seem.

Eugenics is the belief that selecting the mating partners and controlling the offspring improves the quality of human life. According to history, it dates back to Ancient Greece, but after its adaption by the Nazis, eugenics gained much criticism, scrutiny and disapproval.

Some say that eugenics is all-negative because selection is always determined by who is in power, and that it violates every human being’s right to reproduction. Nevertheless, we will soon find out that eugenics does have its own benefits, and knowing the pros and cons of eugenics helps us understand it better. The theory is still very popular today, read more

On the November 1, 2019 episode of “Real Time”, Bill Maher had a conversation with pediatrician Jay Gordon, MD that lasted almost 14 minutes. It was a breath of fresh air to hear an open and frank discussion about vaccines.

Bill Maher, known for having his share of skepticism of health care recommendations and physicians, made the point that the medical profession doesn’t know everything about vaccines or any other drug/procedure. And what the U.S. thought was established science has been overturned many times. Maher and Dr. Gordon agreed that to stop any discussions surrounding vaccines is short-sighted and does no one any good if we are truly committed to public safety of medical products.

CHD is grateful to Bill Maher for breaking the censorship with his courageous interview on coercive government vaccine policies with Dr. Gordon and taking a stand for free speech, open debate and American values. Should you want to express your appreciation, you can reach him on TwitterInstagram and Facebook or through this HBO general email address:  [email protected]



Bill Maher: I thank you for coming on. It’s courageous these days just to speak at all about the subject of vaccines.

Dr. Jay Gordon: They do take shots at you.

Maher: They take shots, yes. [laughter] No, they do. I mean it’s one of those things in our culture where there is the one true opinion. But we don’t play that game here. So, I know you’ve had the experience of being on other shows and when you get off the air–this happens here too–you get off the air and somebody goes “Ah, you know, yeah, but you can’t say that on TV.” Has that happened with you?

Gordon: It has…notably it happened some years ago. I was on a show called The Doctors, which was enjoyable. I was on with a colleague–a doc I’d known for a long time–and it was a show about a family with seven children, the first four of whom had autism. The next three didn’t have autism…and the video of their house was not fun to watch. And she was pregnant with her eighth child. There was a spirited discussion and Dr. Jim Sears, who was a pediatrician on the show–a member of the great Sears family of pediatricians—commented. He said “You know if you were in my practice I wouldn’t vaccinate your eighth child” and everybody applauded.  And after the show was over I walked out to the parking lot with my friend the other pediatrician, good old friend, and he said to me, “Do you really believe that vaccines cause autism?” I said there’s, there’s an impact. I can’t prove anything so I talked quietly. I said let me ask you a question “do you believe that there’s no effect from vaccines on the incidence of autism?” And he said to me, “There might be a very small percentage of children who are adversely affected.” I said, “That’s all! that’s all I’m trying to say!”

Maher: But, you can’t say it on TV.

Gordon: You can’t say it on TV, no.

Maher: Yeah, this is… this is… We’re saying it on TV, yeah. We’re just saying, yes we’re just, and you know, to call you this crazy person I mean, really, what you’re just saying is slower, right?

Gordon: Yes.

Maher: Maybe less numbers and also take into account individuals…

Gordon: Right.

Maher: …people are different. Family history. Stuff like that. I don’t think this is crazy.

Gordon: I don’t think it’s crazy either. If you have seven children and four of them have autism you’ve got to consider the environment.

Maher: Look, the autism issue they certainly have studied it a million times, including out of this country…

Gordon: Yes.

Maher: …no, I don’t trust this country so much because of paychecks–I mean for writing checks to people–but they’ve just… another guy… they say it’s a…and yet there’s all these parents who say I had a normal child got the vaccine…this story keeps coming up. It seems to me more realistic to me, if we’re just gonna be realistic about it, like it probably happened so rarely but no one wants… you can’t say it happens one in a million times because then somebody will think well it’s, it’s, now I could be that millionth one and you see, you scare people. So, you can’t say what might be the more realistic opinion.

Gordon: Regarding a lot of conditions and diseases there’s a genetic predisposition and an environmental trigger. The National Institute of Health used to have a poster that you could buy it said “genetics loads the gun and environment pulls the trigger.” And they were talking about diabetes, they were talking about arthritis and a lot of other conditions. Maybe that’s true about autism but again I talk much more quietly because I have no proof.

Maher: It may be is the whole my whole point with this is maybe, is that we just don’t know so much. this whole situation to me is how you look at it as a patient. As a patient I’ve caught doctors not knowing what they should know. some doctors keep up with what’s happening lately and some stop at medical school I’m told. Have you met doctors who are idiots? [laughter]

Gordon: I’ve been accused of the same myself! [laughter]

Maher: Okay.

Gordon: I’ve met doctors who I don’t think were well enough informed and as you said they just stopped reading and they stopped thinking.

Maher: Well okay, exactly. We are at the beginning of understanding how the human body works. You know people say vaccines…of course vaccines work and we applaud them for all the great things they’ve done. They’re a great tool in the medical kit–maybe the greatest but that’s the beginning of the debate. I don’t understand what they can’t get about that. The big… yes…they work. So do antibiotics work, statins work chemotherapy works. I’m concerned with what happens down the road.

Gordon: Nothing is free. Nothing that I do right is free. I feel like I should give you a little bit of a discussion before I recommend tylenol because of the impact on the liver. A discussion about ibuprofen before about the impact on the kidneys.  And when someone gets antibiotics from me I talked to them about, you know, there could be a yeast infection you could get diarrhea and the rash–sorry about the diarrhea and the rash—

Maher: Right!

Gordon: …but with vaccines, well, the discussion is closed.

Maher: That’s what I’m saying. I’m not an anti-vaxxer. If I was going to Liberia tomorrow and there was an ebola outbreak I’d get…

Gordon: Whatever you could get!

Maher: Yes! Of course! You’d give it to yourself…the flu shot. you say well we’ll get to the flu we’ll get to measles don’t worry.  But, but, here’s the thing…they’ve been wrong about so much. I object to when doctors, the people in the white coats, are like “Don’t ask any questions about this…when have we ever been wrong?” When? Just with me, you drilled mercury into my teeth you put me on accutane which is one of almost a hundred medications that were said safe and effective that had been pulled off the market.

Gordon: Black box warnings.

Maher: Black box?

Gordon: Black box warnings that’s what they call it and it’s, it’s read this before you prescribe or take this medication. You could die.

Maher: Right, okay I haven’t died but they did a lot I mean I have had misdiagnosis a bacterial infection that was really a fungal infection lots of stuff that this whole idea when were we ever wrong all the time, you don’t know one week you tell us this is Time magazine from two years ago surprising news about salt.

Gordon: Yes.

Maher: All my life I’ve been told this, a new study found healthy people who reported eating more sodium had no higher blood pressure than those who weigh less. Trans-fats remember? 15 years ago, get that in ya. The Can’t believe it’s not butter, now it’s illegal. Turned out to be the worst!

Gordon: Well that scandal…some years ago when they were trying to find the, the genesis of heart disease there were two considerations sugar and fat, right? They paid off Harvard Medical School professors 50 grand to lay the blame at the feet of fat.

Maher: Right.

Gordon: And, for a long time we were told now a high-fat diet makes you fat it’s…

Maher: The food pyramid was bull****! [laughter]

Gordon: Right.

Maher: Four servings of bread… excuse me, I don’t think any servings of bread are good! Now people are like, “What are you talking about, Bill?…wholesome wheat. Look it up ! You know these people who were like don’t talk about vaccines because you don’t know anything…YOU don’t know anything!

Gordon: We’re told that in medical school a third or a half of what you learned this year will probably be wrong five years from now not just a little bit… a hundred and eighty degrees wrong!

Maher: All I’m saying is, as, for me I had my childhood vaccines okay I got a flu shot once a long time ago gave me the flu right away. Which is okay, it didn’t kill me. But it’s not what it’s supposed to do.

Gordon: Well, that’s embarrassing, isn’t it? They gave you a shot and you got sick.

Maher: I’m just saying, that vaccines like every medicine right have side effects.

Gordon: Yes.

Maher: Okay and so let’s not deny that or pretend it doesn’t happen.

Gordon: Right.

Maher: So, we’re just talking about which ones, how much, how do we manage this. This is not crazy talk.

Gordon: We don’t do it the way that we should do it. Manufacturers don’t put… we don’t manufacture vaccines as well as we could. We have a schedule that’s invariable for every single child, one size doesn’t really fit all.

Maher: Right.

Gordon: The polio vaccine that I would get as a hundred and eighty pound man is the same thing that I give to a 12 pound baby. We could do it a lot better. I don’t want to bring…I don’t want to bring polio back. I don’t want to bring measles back.

Maher: Of course not.

Gordon: Measles is a nasty illness.

Maher: And we had news in the…It’s interesting you heard today, just today they found out that measles has something called…

Gordon: Amnesia…it causes it causes the immune system to forget a lot of the antibodies…

Maher: So, it’s actually a harm…a much more harmful disease than we thought.

Gordon: It is. It…

Maher: Great! New information right we’re accepting of new information. Everyone should be!

Gordon: It’s called learning you learn, you learn…

Maher: Right. So okay let me just read you this. This is from the New York Times a year and a half ago. Is this tissue a new organ? Maybe. A conduit for cancer? It seems likely. Let me just read a little bit from the article. “Researchers have made new discoveries about the in between spaces in the human body and some say it’s time to rewrite the anatomy books.

Gordon: The interstitial they call it…

Maher: Right. The fluid filled 3D latticework of collagen and elastin connective tissue that can be found all over the body. They say it’s hard to describe. It’s a highway of moving fluid a previously unknown feature of human anatomy. So there’s this whole new organ in the body we didn’t know about a year and a half ago, but you’re telling me don’t ask questions about “this”. This is just so ridiculous and for people who are saying “Whoa Bill, what does that have to do with vaccines?” if you can’t figure that out, stop listening. [laughter] I’m just saying we don’t know s*** that’s why when doctors–you get a diagnosis, the other doctor gives you another one. They say right away, they get a second opinion. Well, okay. Right away you’re telling me it’s an opinion and the second one never matches the first. We’re guessing. We don’t know a lot about how the body works, so how did vaccines fit in with, I don’t know, all the new chemicals that have–there’s thousands of new chemicals, pollutants, irritants. We didn’t used to have all this corn syrup in our bodies. Antibiotics. It could be any combination! So, I’m a little cautious.

Gordon: Everybody who writes newspaper columns and people on…pundits on television, ridicule the pharmaceutical industry. The high cost of epinephrine–it is five hundred dollars. Three hundred and eleven thousand dollar medication for children for cystic fibrosis. The fact that we pay ten times more for medications than in other countries. They make fun of the pharmaceutical industry–say they don’t trust the pharmaceutical industry, except for this. That’s one sacrament that’s…and they’re… nobody’s doing honest reporting about this and it drives me crazy…

Maher: Okay

Gordon: …because there aren’t two sides to it… it’s not pro and anti… there are people in the middle as you mentioned. I give vaccines I get vaccines but I’d like to slow down a little bit and I’d like to talk.

Maher: I mean…here… well, we’re doing it. oh okay.

Gordon: Thank you.

Maher: Thank you. The flu vaccine. I would never get one. Here’s…now last year it was 47% effective.

Gordon: That was a good year.

Maher: That was a good year. In 2014 it was 19% effective.

Gordon: It was not a good year.[laughter]

Maher: ‘04 it was 10 percent effective, ‘05 it was 21 percent effective but they don’t say well it’s not very effective don’t take it. That doesn’t make people a little skeptical?

Gordon: It should make them very skeptical…

Maher: Thank you.

Gordon: …and there are experts who, who have studied this who said, “Look we have to stop telling people that we have a great flu shot because it keeps venture-capital out of the arena we could eventually have a great flu shot.” And one of the more interesting scandals involved the flu mist, the nasal flu vaccine. We promoted that vaccine heavily because there’s no needle. It was found that for two years that shot had zero effectiveness. Zero efficacy. They pulled it off the market last year and they put it back on the market this year, kind of we’ll see. So there were doctors wandering around the newborn intensive care unit who thought that they had immunity to influenza and they had nothing.

Maher: We don’t…it’s arrogant. You know, I read recently they don’t know how anesthesia works. They know that it works, they don’t know why.

Gordon: Right, [laughter] exactly. [laughter]

Maher: But I should just shut up about all the…it’s…

Gordon: Anesthesia in childhood is it is a very controversial topic because it’s not good for you to be knocked out. So, I’ve done reading to find out why does general anesthesia work. We don’t know! If we speculate, they say perhaps it destroys fat in the braincells. We don’t know.

Maher: Right.

Gordon: That’s strange.

Maher: You know when someone comes to me and they say you know I went to the doctor today I have cancer and they know exactly what caused it and they know exactly how to cure it then I’ll say okay I’ll shut up about asking questions about anything else medical. Until then I’m not going to shut up and you shouldn’t either. Thank you so much. [Applause]

View/Download PDF

Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. CHD is planning many strategies, including legal, in an effort to defend the health of our children and obtain justice for those already injured. Your support is essential to CHD’s successful mission.